Skip to main content

Defining Fascism

Scholarly frameworks and objective criteria for identifying fascism

Fascism isn't a political label—it's a scholarly term with specific meaning. Leading academics have developed rigorous frameworks for identifying fascist movements based on historical analysis. These frameworks were established long before Trump's presidency.

Why Definitions Matter

Without clear criteria, "fascism" becomes mere insult. Scholars use precise frameworks to distinguish fascist movements from other forms of authoritarianism. These definitions aren't arbitrary—they're based on decades of historical research analyzing actual fascist regimes.

The frameworks below come from leading experts in fascism studies. None were created to target Trump specifically. They exist to help us recognize dangerous patterns before they become irreversible.

📘Framework 1: Umberto Eco's "Ur-Fascism" (1995)

About Umberto Eco: Italian philosopher and novelist who lived under Mussolini's fascism as a child. His essay "Ur-Fascism" (1995) is one of the most widely cited frameworks for identifying fascist movements.

Key insight: Fascism has no single defining feature, but rather a cluster of characteristics. A movement exhibiting many of these traits warrants the fascist label.

Source: "Ur-Fascism" by Umberto Eco, The New York Review of Books, 1995

1. Cult of tradition

Belief that all truth has already been revealed by tradition

2. Rejection of modernism

Views Enlightenment rationalism as descent into depravity; anti-intellectualism

3. Action for action's sake

Action valued without intellectual reflection; "thinking is emasculation"

4. Disagreement is treason

Critical thinking viewed as betrayal; dissent equals disloyalty

5. Fear of difference

Intolerance of diversity; fear and hatred of outsiders

6. Appeal to social frustration

Exploitation of economic or social anxiety; channeling resentment

7. Obsession with a plot

Followers feel besieged by internal and external enemies

8. Enemies simultaneously strong and weak

Foes depicted as overwhelming threat yet easily defeated

9. Pacifism is trafficking with the enemy

Life is permanent warfare; peace is treason

10. Contempt for the weak

Elitism; celebration of strength, disdain for vulnerability

11. Cult of heroism and death

Hero worship; willingness to die for the cause

12. Machismo and weaponry

Disdain for women; cult of masculinity and weapons

13. Selective populism

Leader claims to speak for "the people" (selectively defined)

14. Newspeak

Impoverished vocabulary limiting critical thinking

📙Framework 2: Lawrence Britt's 14 Characteristics (2003)

About Lawrence Britt: Political scientist who analyzed fascist regimes of the 20th century (Hitler, Mussolini, Franco, Suharto, Pinochet) to identify common patterns.

Key insight: Despite different cultural contexts, all fascist regimes exhibited remarkably similar characteristics.

Source: "Fascism Anyone?" by Lawrence Britt, Free Inquiry Magazine, 2003

1. Powerful and continuing nationalism

Constant use of patriotic mottos, slogans, symbols, songs, and rhetoric

2. Disdain for human rights

Fear used as motivational tool to ignore rights abuses

3. Identification of enemies/scapegoats

Unifying cause against perceived threat or foe; scapegoating

4. Supremacy of the military

Military funded disproportionately despite domestic needs

5. Rampant sexism

Traditional gender roles; opposition to abortion/homosexuality

6. Controlled mass media

Media directly or indirectly controlled; censorship and propaganda

7. Obsession with national security

Fear used to justify policies; suspension of liberties

8. Religion and government intertwined

Religious rhetoric by leaders; appearance of religiosity

9. Corporate power protected

Business elite protected; labor suppressed

10. Labor power suppressed

National labor movement suppressed; organizing power eliminated

11. Disdain for intellectuals and arts

Hostility toward academia, artists, and education; censorship

12. Obsession with crime and punishment

Police given unlimited power; law and order rhetoric

13. Rampant cronyism and corruption

Appointees are friends and associates; no accountability

14. Fraudulent elections

Elections manipulated by smear campaigns, legislation, vote rigging

📕Framework 3: Robert Paxton's Definition

About Robert Paxton: Columbia University historian, world's leading expert on fascism, author of "The Anatomy of Fascism" (2004)—the definitive scholarly text on the subject.

Source: "The Anatomy of Fascism" by Robert Paxton, 2004

Paxton's Definition

"Fascism may be defined as a form of political behavior marked by obsessive preoccupation with community decline, humiliation, or victimhood and by compensatory cults of unity, energy, and purity, in which a mass-based party of committed nationalist militants, working in uneasy but effective collaboration with traditional elites, abandons democratic liberties and pursues with redemptive violence and without ethical or legal restraints goals of internal cleansing and external expansion."

Key elements:

  • Sense of overwhelming crisis beyond conventional solutions
  • Primacy of the group, with individual rights subordinated
  • Belief that one's group is victim, justifying any action
  • Need for closer integration through violence if necessary
  • Need for authority by natural leaders (not institutions)
  • Beauty of violence and efficacy of will
  • Right of chosen people to dominate others without restraint

📗Framework 4: Jason Stanley's 10 Pillars (2018)

About Jason Stanley: Yale University philosopher, author of "How Fascism Works: The Politics of Us and Them" (2018). Analyzes how fascist politics function in practice.

Key insight: Fascism is not just about what leaders believe, but how they manipulate politics, language, and social divisions.

Source: "How Fascism Works" by Jason Stanley, 2018

1. Mythic past

Nostalgia for fabricated glorious past; promise of restoration

2. Propaganda

Repeated lies creating alternative reality; entertainment replaces news

3. Anti-intellectualism

Attack on universities, experts, and "elites"; celebration of ignorance

4. Unreality

Replacement of factual reality with conspiratorial fiction

5. Hierarchy

Natural social order with dominant group; others inferior

6. Victimhood

Dominant group portrayed as victims of minority groups

7. Law and order

Selective enforcement protecting dominant group

8. Sexual anxiety

Panic about threats to traditional gender/sexual norms

9. Sodom and Gomorrah

Urban corruption vs. rural purity; city vs. country

10. Arbeit macht frei

Work dignifies; laziness explained by racial/ethnic characteristics

🎯Commonalities Across Frameworks

Despite different methodologies, all four frameworks identify the same core characteristics. This scholarly consensus gives us confidence in these criteria.

Ultranationalism

Present in: Eco #1,5; Britt #1; Paxton; Stanley #1

Obsessive focus on national glory, "us vs. them" mentality, xenophobia

Scapegoating of Outgroups

Present in: Eco #5,7,8; Britt #3; Paxton; Stanley #5,6

Blaming minorities for problems; dehumanization; "enemies within"

Cult of Personality/Strongman

Present in: Eco #1,13; Britt #14; Paxton; Stanley #7

Leader above law; personality worship; demand for loyalty

Rejection of Democratic Norms

Present in: Eco #4; Britt #14; Paxton; Stanley #7

Disagreement is treason; election denial; attacks on institutions

Use of Violence/Threat of Violence

Present in: Eco #9,11; Britt #12; Paxton; Stanley #7

Political violence encouraged; law and order rhetoric; paramilitary groups

Mythic Past

Present in: Eco #1; Britt #1; Paxton; Stanley #1

Nostalgia for fabricated golden age; promise of restoration

Attacks on Truth/Reality

Present in: Eco #14; Britt #6; Paxton; Stanley #2,4

Propaganda; alternative facts; attacks on press and experts

Victimhood Narrative

Present in: Eco #7,8; Britt #3; Paxton; Stanley #6

Dominant group portrayed as victims; persecution complex

Key Takeaway

These aren't cherry-picked characteristics designed to target Trump. They're scholarly frameworks established through decades of historical research. The fact that they all identify similar patterns gives us confidence these are genuine markers of fascist movements.

Now That We've Defined Fascism

With these objective, scholarly frameworks established, we can now examine Trump's actions against these criteria. The next section documents how Trump's words and behavior align with these characteristics.

Next: See comprehensive documentation of Trump's alignment with these fascist characteristics →